ABSTRACT
Introducción: La artroplastia total de cadera de revisión junto con la utilización de injerto óseo cadavérico de banco de tejidos es una alternativa de tratamiento eficaz ante los procedimientos de reemplazo con déficit óseo femoral o acetabular. El presente estudio, analizó los resultados post operatorios en pacientes intervenidos quirúrgicamente en el Hospital de Clínicas. Materiales y métodos: Estudio descriptivo. Muestreo no probabilístico de casos consecutivos atendidos en la Cátedra de Ortopedia y Traumatología de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas (U.N.A). Fueron captados pacientes con indicación de artroplastia total de cadera de revisión (ATCR) más injerto óseo cadavérico de banco de tejidos, entre diciembre 2017 - octubre 2020, previo consentimiento informado. Se relevaron datos cuya caracterización fue posible mediante un instrumento establecido previamente, ingresado en base Excel. Resultados: 12 pacientes con déficit óseo femoral y acetabular han sido tratados con artroplastia total de cadera de revisión más injerto óseo cadavérico de banco de tejidos, en donde además de la funcionalidad y a través de seguimientos radiológicos se ha determinado la osteointegración total de los aloinjertos. La relación masculino-femenina fue 1/1, siendo el diagnóstico preoperatorio para la colocación de la prótesis de revisión más injerto óseo cadavérico de banco de tejidos el aflojamiento séptico en un 75%. El motivo de consulta más frecuente fue dolor y la secreción y el tiempo quirúrgico fue en promedio de 116 minutos. Conclusión: La artroplastia total de cadera de revisión más aloinjerto presenta óptimos resultados en relación a la osteointegración total y funcionalidad.
Introduction: Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of cadaveric bone graft is an effective treatment for replacement procedures in patients with bone loss femoral or acetabular. The present study analyzed the postoperative results in patients who underwent surgery at the Hospital de Clínicas. Materials and methods: Descriptive study. Non-probabilistic sampling of consecutive cases treated at the Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology of Hospital de Clínicas. Data of patients with indication for revision total hip arthroplasty plus cadaveric bone graft from a tissue bank with prior informed consent,were analyzed between December 2017 and October 2020. Results: 12 patients with femoral and acetabular bone deficits have been treated with revision total hip arthroplasty plus cadaveric bone graft from a tissue bank. A radiological and functional follow up was made. The male-female ratio was 1/1, with the preoperative diagnosis for placement of the revision prosthesis plus cadaveric bone graft,from the tissue bank,was septic loosening in 75%. The most frequent symptom was pain, all revision total hip arthroplasties were performed through a posterior approach, and the surgical time was an average of 116 minutes,using a later approach in all cases.Two intraoperative fracture was presented, and were resolved. Conclusion: Revision total hip arthroplasty plus allograft presents optimal results in relation to total osseointegration and functionality.
Subject(s)
Transplants , Tissue Banks , Tissues , Traumatology , HipABSTRACT
Objective To explore the strategies of perioperative antithrombotic therapy in the patient undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty after coronary stent implantation. Methods The antithrombotic therapy in one patient undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty after coronary stent implantation was analyzed with the review of related literatures. Results The patient developed non-ST segment elevated myocardial infarction due to the stop of aspirin three days before operation and no low molecular weight heparin was used. The antithrombotic treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism were analyzed. Conclusion Antithrombotic therapy should be selected reasonably in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty after coronary stent implantation.
ABSTRACT
@#Introduction: This study aims to investigate whether patients undergoing two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and one-stage revision THA for aseptic reasons have similar clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction during their post-operative follow-up. We hypothesise that the two-stage revision THA for PJI is associated with poorer outcomes as compared to aseptic revision THA. Materials and Methods: We reviewed prospectively collected data in our tertiary hospital arthroplasty registry and identified patients who underwent revision THA between 2001 and 2014, with a minimum of two years follow-up. The study group (two-stage revision THA for PJI) consists of 23 patients and the control group (one-stage revision THA for aseptic reasons) consists of 231 patients. Patient demographics, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores and patient reported satisfaction were evaluated. Student’s t-test was used to compare continuous variables between the two groups. Statistical significance was defined as p <0.05. Results: The pre-operative demographics and clinical scores were relatively similar between the two groups of patients. At two years, patients who underwent revision THA for PJI reported a better WOMAC Pain Score and OHS as compared to aseptic revision THA. A similar proportion of patients were satisfied with their results of surgery in both groups (p=0.093). Conclusions: Although patients who underwent revision THA for PJI had poorer pre-operative functional scores (WOMAC function and SF-36 PF), at two years follow-up, these two groups of patients have comparable post-operative outcomes. Interestingly, patients who had revision THA for PJI reported a better clinical outcome in terms of OHS and WOMAC Pain score as compared to the aseptic group. We conclude that the revision THA for PJI is not inferior to aseptic revision THA in terms of patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiographic results of revision total hip arthroplasty with constrained liner in patients with abductor insufficiency. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 30 patients treated with constrained liner during revision total hip arthroplasty due to abductor insufficiency were evaluated after minimum 2-year follow-up. There were 14 men and 16 women and the mean follow-up period was 4.6 years. Re-dislocation and aseptic loosening of the implant were defined as a failure of the constrained liner. Harris hip score and ambulatory function were evaluated as a clinical parameter and osteolysis, aseptic loosening of the implant and other complications were evaluated as a radiologic parameter. RESULTS: During the follow-up period, there were 4 cases (13.3%) of constrained liner failure including two cases of re-dislocation and two cases of acetabular cup aseptic loosening. The average Harris hip score was improved from 38.3 points preoperatively to 73.4 points at last follow up. At the final follow-up, there were 20 cases (66.7%) of improvement in ambulatory function. There was 1 case of infection and 1 case of periprosthetic fracture. CONCLUSION: Use of a constrained liner during revision total hip arthroplasty showed satisfactory results for prevention of re-dislocation in patients with abductor insufficiency. However longer term studies on loosening of implants are needed.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Acetabulum , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Follow-Up Studies , Hip , Osteolysis , Periprosthetic FracturesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to report the short-term outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using tantalum augments in patients with severe acetabular bone defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 15 revision THAs performed in 15 patients using tantalum augments between June 2010 and December 2013. Acetabular bone defects were Paprosky type IIIA in 7 hips, type IIIB in 7, and type IV in 1. The causes of revision surgery were aseptic loosening in 12 hips and deep infection in 3. Revisions were first in 1 hip, second in 3, and third in 11. Six patients were male and 9 female with a mean age of 59 years (range, 48-75 years). Mean follow-up was 29 months (range, 24-48 months). RESULTS: Mean Harris hip score was improved from 34 points (range, 12-54 points) preoperatively to 84 points (range, 38-90 points) at final follow-up. On the final follow-up radiographs, there were 12 hips (80.0%) with stable fixation of the acetabular cup, 2 (13.3%) with secondary stability after mild acetabular protrusion, and 1 (6.7%) with radiolucency around the acetabular cup without mechanical symptoms. Complications included one patient with acute hematogenous infection managed by surgical debridement and long-term antibiotic therapy. There were no cases with nerve palsy or dislocation during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The present study showed satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes of revision THA using tantalum augments due to severe acetabular bone defects of Paprosky type III or IV at a minimum follow-up of 2 years.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Acetabulum , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Debridement , Joint Dislocations , Follow-Up Studies , Hip , Paralysis , Retrospective Studies , TantalumABSTRACT
Objective Uncemented prothesis has become the preference of first hip arthroplasty, but there is a little study on its application in cemented acetabular revision arthroplasty.This paper aimed to evaluate the clinical effects of uncemented acetabular cup in cemented acetabular prosthesis revision arthroplasty. Methods A retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 31 patients(31 hips) who underwent revision arthroplasty using uncemented acetabular prosthesis from January 2012 to March 2015.Har-ris hip score( HSS) was applied to measure the hip function and visual analogue score( VAS) was preformed to assess the pain degree of knee joint preoperatively and postoperatively(3 months, 6 months and 1 year).All the patients were followed up for a mean of 22 months ranging from 3 to 42 months. Result The mean HSS increased from preoperative points (53.19 ±9.12) to postoperative points([77.71 ±5.75]at 3 months,[80.61 ±5.74] at 6 months,[82.94 ±5.80] at 1 year ).The mean VAS score decreased from preoperativepoints (6.23 ±1.23) to postoperative points(0.26 ±0.27).No lossening, infection or deep vein thrombosis were found in the patients′prostheses. Conclusion For patients with PaproskyI-Ⅱ acetabular defects, uncemented acetabular prosthesis has satisfactory short-term clinical results in revision arthroplasty with cemented acetabular prosthesis, however, long-term clinical results remain to be further observed.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Wear cannot be completely prevented after total hip arthroplasty. If severe polyethylene (PE) liner wear develops, the so-called catastrophic failure occurs and metallosis develops. We postulated that longevity of the new implant may be affected after revision surgery for metallosis following a catastrophic failure of a PE liner due to the substantial amount of PE wear particles and infiltration of the metal particles in this catastrophic condition. METHODS: Twenty-three hips of 23 patients were identified because they showed metallosis during revision total hip arthroplasties performed in Seoul National University Hospital between January 1996 and August 2004. They were followed for at least 6.5 years after the index revision total hip arthroplasty. The clinical and radiological results of revision total hip arthroplasties in these patients were evaluated. RESULTS: The median Harris hip score increased from 60 points before revision total hip arthroplasties to 90 points at the final follow-up. Osteolysis was detected at an average of 9.3 years after revision total hip arthroplasties in 13 hips and acetabular cup loosening at average 9.8 years after revision total hip arthroplasties in 9 hips. With radiographic evidence of osteolysis and loosening as the end points, the 15-year survival rates were 28.2% and 56.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The survival rate of revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with metallosis following a catastrophic failure of a PE liner was low.
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Biocompatible Materials , Hip Joint/diagnostic imaging , Hip Prosthesis/adverse effects , Joint Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Metals/adverse effects , Metals, Heavy/poisoning , Osteolysis/etiology , Poisoning/etiology , Polyethylene/adverse effects , Prosthesis Design , Prosthesis Failure/etiology , ReoperationABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The results of ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearing surfaces in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) were well known. However, it was not known in revision THA. The purpose of this study is to report the results of revision THA with ceramic articulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 112 revision THAs were evaluated. The mean age at the time of surgery was 51.6 years (27.7 to 84.2 years). The mean duration of the follow-up periods was 6.3 years (2.3 to 11.4 years). RESULTS: The Harris hip scores improved from an average of 56.2 at the index surgery to an average of 93.3 at the last follow-up (P<0.001). None of hips showed osteolysis or ceramic head fracture. One hip showed aseptic loosening in the acetabular component with squeaking that caused a re-revision. There were nine cases of dislocation. The survivorship at 5 years was 94.5% (95% confidence interval, 87.9% to 97.6%) with revision for any reason as the endpoint and 100% with femoral revision. CONCLUSION: The ceramic articulation is one of good bearing options for revision THA in patients with a long life expectancy.
Subject(s)
Humans , Acetabulum , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Ceramics , Joint Dislocations , Follow-Up Studies , Head , Hip , Life Expectancy , Osteolysis , Survival RateABSTRACT
Recently, the incidence of revision total hip arthroplasty following primary total hip arthroplasty has increased. However, revision after primary total hip arthroplasty is usually much more difficult than the first time, and the results are typically not as satisfactory as that after most primary total hip arthroplasty procedures. Therefore, thoughtful and thorough preoperative planning will certainly provides the patient with the best opportunity for long-term success. In particular, location and size of acetabular bone defects dictate the type of acetabular component in revision in total hip arthroplasty. For most defects, a porous-coated hemispherical shell secured to host bone with multiple screws is the implant of choice. This reconstruction is feasible provided that at least 50% of the implant is in contact with host bone. When such contact is not possible, and there is adequate medial and peripheral bone, techniques using alternative uncemented implants can be used for acetabular reconstruction. Defects with greater bone loss or compromised columns require the use of either modular augments combined with a hemispherical shell, reconstruction cages, structural allografts, or impaction allograft. Therefore, we attempt to introduce the most commonly-adopted system for classification of acetabular defects and the necessary preoperative evaluation, intraoperative detail, and reported results of these acetabular revisions.
Subject(s)
Humans , Arthroplasty , Hip , Incidence , Transplantation, HomologousABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the revision total hip arthroplasty using the acetabular reinforcement ring. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six acetabular revisions were performed in 36 patients with use of the reinforcement ring and structural or morselized allograft, between 1997 and 2005, in thirty-six patients. According to the AAOS classification, thirty-four cases of acetabular defects were Ttype III, and two were Ttype IV. Mean follow-up period after surgery was 7.2 years. RESULTS: The mean Harris hip score was 92.3, which was significantly increased compared with the preoperative score. (p<0.001). There were five failures: a case of aseptic loosening of Muller ring, two cases of infection (5.4%) and two cases of hip dislocation (5.4%). Graft incorporation and bone remodeling occurred successfully in all hips, but in the case of aseptic loosening in which the ring fixation had been inadequate at the time of surgery. The success rate was 91.7% with a mean follow-up of 7.2 years, if the cases of revision or loosening of the component were classified into failure cases. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with acetabular revision with three kinds of reinforcement ring had reconstitution of periacetabular bone stock as well as good clinical and radiographic results. For the good results, the secure implant fixation during the surgery should be confirmed and we should completely understand the characters of the each kinds of reinforcement rings.
Subject(s)
Humans , Acetabulum , Arthroplasty , Bone Remodeling , Follow-Up Studies , Hip , Hip Dislocation , Reinforcement, Psychology , Transplantation, Homologous , TransplantsABSTRACT
Recently, the incidence of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) has increased following primary THA. Bone stock deficiency presents the major challenge in acetabular reconstruction during revision hip arthroplasty. The reasons for such acetabular defects include osteolysis, bone resportion following cup loosening, iatrogenic damage resulting from cup or cement removal during revision THA, and cup migration. The pre-operative assessment of acetabular bone stock, including the amount and location of pelvic osteolysis before revision surgery, is a critical preoperative preparation for the treatment of bone deficiency. In cases with mild acetabular defects, a variety of surgical options are available for treating. However, in cases with severe segmental, cavitary, or combined acetabular defects, controversies have existed so far about the most optimal treatment. Thereby, we tend to introduce the most commonly-adopted classification system of acetabular defects and management options using high hip center cups, oblong cups, structural allografts, morselized allografts with bipolar cups, morselized allografts with cementless cups, morselized allografts with acetabular reinforcement devices, and revisions with trabecular metal augmentations.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty , Hip , Incidence , Osteolysis , Reinforcement, Psychology , Tacrine , Transplantation, HomologousABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To analyze the results of isolated exchange of polyethylene (PE) liners for treatment of wear and osteolysis around a well-fixed Harris-Galante (HG) cementless acetabular cup. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three PE liner changes were performed without the removal of stably ingrown implants (33 hips of 32 patients). They were able to be followed for a mean period of 92 months. Clinically, the Harris hip score (HHS), pain evaluation, and complications were evaluated. Radiologically, the annual wear rate and the size of the osteolytic lesions were measured before the operation and the latest follow-up. The bone graft incorporation scale and the development of new osleolytic lesions were checked during the final follow-up. RESULTS: HHS improved to 89.3 at last follow-up. The size of the osteolysis was significantly reduced postoperatively. Bone graft incorporation scales were Grade I in 9 and Grade II in 14 cases. New osteolytic lesions have not developed at latest follow-up. As a complication, one case of dissociation of a liner and a periprosthetic fracture were noted. Annual wear rates during the same period were significantly reduced. There was no sign of alteration in stability of the PE liner. CONCLUSION: Exchange of a PE liner without removal of stable implants can be a good option for the treatment of wear and osteolysis around a stable cementless THA implant, even if the system has a weak locking mechanism, such as the HG cup. In these cases, under certain states with a higher risk of early failure in the locking mechanism, it would be better to select other revision procedures such as cup revision or cemented polyethylene liner fixation.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty , Dissociative Disorders , Follow-Up Studies , Hip , Osteolysis , Periprosthetic Fractures , Polyethylene , Tacrine , Transplants , Weights and MeasuresABSTRACT
PURPOSE: We wanted to evaluate the mid-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty using a fully porous-coated long stem. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective series of 20 hips in 19 patients who underwent stem revision with a fully porous-coated long stem were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 64.6 months. The causes of revision were aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fracture and infected arthroplasty. Four kinds of implants had previously been used and an additional bone graft procedure had been done in 17 cases. The Harris hip scores, thigh pain, limping and ROM were reported. Radiological changes of the radiolucent signs, subsidence, loosening and the stress shielding signs were evaluated. RESULTS: The Harris hip score improved from an average of 56.5 to 91.9 and the ROMs were satisfactory. The only case with persistent thigh pain showed stable bony ingrowth. No signs of subsidence or loosening of the stem was found in all the cases. There were 2 cases of periprosthetic fracture. None of the patients experienced re-revision surgery. CONCLUSION: The mid-term results of revision hip arthroplasty using a fully porous coated long stem have demonstrated that it provides a reliable initial fixation with a propensity for stable longevity. It is relatively easy for the techniques, and there is the opportunity to restore the bone stock by bone-grafting procedures with diaphyseal fixation and bypassing a bone defect. Yet alternative techniques may be required for the femur with extensive diaphyseal bone loss. There are some concerns about the technique and the possibility of making a crack in the femur during the operation, which will cause thigh pain at the follow-up. So, only by employing great caution when performing this technique can successful results be guaranteed.
Subject(s)
Humans , Arthroplasty , Femur , Follow-Up Studies , Hip , Longevity , Osteolysis , Periprosthetic Fractures , Retrospective Studies , Thigh , TransplantsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: We wanted to report on the outcomes of using a strut allograft and extensively porous-coated femoral stems in revision total hip arthroplasty that was performed due to extensive femoral bone loss. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1998 and 2005, we performed 167 consecutive revision total hip arthroplasties. Among them, twelve cementless femoral revision surgeries with a strut allograft and extensively porous-coated stems were retrospectively reviewed. The average follow up was 4.6 years. The average age at the time of the index revision was 55.9 years. The reasons for the revisions were periprosthetic fracture due to extensive osteolysis in 5 hips and aseptic loosening in 7 hips. RESULTS: The Harris hip score improved from a mean of 40.8 points before revision surgery to a mean of 85.1 points at the latest follow up. Radiographic evidence of bony stable stems were present in 11 hips and a fibrous stable stem was present in 1 hip. Moderate stress-shielding was noticed in one hip. Nonunion of the allograft was observed in 1 hip due to deep infection. To date, no significant wear or osteolysis has been observed. CONCLUSION: Revision total hip arthroplasty with a strut allograft and an extensively porous-coated femoral stem for treating cases of extensive femoral bone loss seems to be a reasonable choice. However, the concerns related to stress shielding, the difficulties in re-revisions and the complications associated with an allograft will require longer term follow up.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty , Follow-Up Studies , Hip , Osteolysis , Periprosthetic Fractures , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation, HomologousABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To determine the benefit of an extensively porous coated femoral stem in patients receiving revision total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: This study reviewed the results of 35 patients who received a revision total hip arthroplasty with extensively porous coated femoral stem between August, 1996, and December, 2002. The mean follow-up period was 77.5 months. The clinical and radiological results were evaluated by the Harris hip score and serial roentgenographic findings. RESULTS: The preoperative and postoperative Harris hip score was 68.3 and 92.5, respectively. Radiographically, none of the acetabular components showed any evidence of migration, tilt, rotation, or shedding of metal particles. In addition, none of the femoral components showed evidence of subsidence, pedestal, or shedding of metal particles. Twenty-two hips had a mild stress shield and 2 hips had a moderate stress shield. The perioperative complications encountered were deep vein thrombosis (1 case), mild heterotopic ossification (4 cases), intraoperative periprosthetic fractures (1 case), and nonunion of the trochanteric osteotomy site (2 cases). CONCLUSIONS: Extensively porous coated femoral stems and acetabular components produce excellent clinical and radiological results in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Subject(s)
Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Coated Materials, Biocompatible , Hip Prosthesis , Porosity , ReoperationABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the radiographic mid-to long-term result of femoral revision hip arthroplasty using impacted cancellous allograft combined with cemented, collarless, polished and tapered stem. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 27 patients with impacted cancellous allograft with a cemented stem, 28 hips from 26 consecutive patients were analyzed retrospectively. The average patient age was 59 years. The follow-up period ranged 36 months to 10 years, 3 months (mean, 76.6 months). Radiographic parameters analyzed in this study included subsidence of the stem in the cement, subsidence of the cement mantle in the femur, bone remodeling of the femur, radiolucent line, and osteolysis. RESULTS: Radiographic analysis showed very stable stem initially. 27 stems showed minimal subsidence (less than 5mm) and 1 stem showed moderate subsidence (about 8 mm) in the cement. But there was no mechanical failure and subsidence at the composit-femur interface. Evidence of cortical and trabecular remodeling were observed in all cases. No radiolucent line or osteolysis were found in the follow-up period. There were 4 proximal femoral cracks and 1 distal femoral splitting during operation. CONCLUSION: The result of cemented stem revision with the use of impacted cancellous allograft was good mid-to long-term. and femoral bone stock deficiency may be reconstructed successfully.
Subject(s)
Humans , Arthroplasty , Bone Remodeling , Femur , Follow-Up Studies , Hip , Osteolysis , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation, HomologousABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes after revision total hip arthroplasty using the S-ROM modular system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three consecutive patients (24 hips) who underwent femoral stem revision with the S-ROM modular system were followed for more than two years. The average follow-up period was 44 months (range, 24~72 months), and the average age at the time of the revision was 48 years (range, 30~68 years). Underlying causes for revisions included 23 cases of aseptic loosening and 1 case of septic loosening. Femoral bone defects according to the Paprosky system were classified as type II in 12 hips, type III in 8, and type IV in 4. The clinical and radiographic results were evaluated. RESULTS: At the time of latest follow-up, there was no femoral stem loosening, osteolysis, radiolucency, or rerevision. Although 3 cases of Paprosky classification type IV showed subsidence, stable fibrous fixation was achieved in these hips. Complications included 1 intraoperative femoral shaft crack and 1 postoperative deep infection. CONCLUSION: We can achieve stable initial fixation using the S-ROM modular system with proximal press fitting sleeve and fluted stem.
Subject(s)
Humans , Arthroplasty , Follow-Up Studies , Hip , OsteolysisABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To analyze clinical and radiological follow-up results of patients who underwent revision hip arthroplasty with a cemented stem. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study reviewed the records of 31 patients (34 hips), who underwent revision hip arthroplasty with a cemented stem between February, 1993 and May, 2004 after an average follow-up of eight years. There were 14 segmental type hips according to the femoral bone defect using the AAOS classification. According to the Paprosky classification, there were 7 and 5 type IIC and type III hips indicating a severe bone defect. Immediate postoperative cement mantle grades were grades A and B(26 hips) and grade C, D(8 hips). RESULTS: The Kaplan Meier survival rate of the cemented stem was 80.7% at 8 years. Re-revision hip arthroplasty was performed in 5 hips, in whom aseptic loosening occurred 4 hips, and infection occurred 1 hip, which was cured by re-surgery. Immediately after the operation, 4 out of the 5 re-revision cases were classified as C & D in the Barrack classification of the cement mantle. Overall, an inadequate cement mantle led to a poorer survival rate. CONCLUSION: The results of revision hip arthroplasty using a cemented stem were not so good. However, the cemented stem might be used in cases considered unsuitable for a cementless stem if a good cement mantle could be achieved using a skillful cement technique.
Subject(s)
Humans , Arthroplasty , Classification , Follow-Up Studies , Hip , Survival RateABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study evaluated the clinical and radiographic results of an acetabular reconstruction with an impacted morselized allograft and wire mesh in revision total hip arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study examined 21 cases of acetabular revisions involving 20 patients with a severe acetabular bone defect managed with an impacted morselized allograft, wire mesh and cemented acetabular cup between February 2000 and June 2003. The mean follow up period was 31.7 months. Clinically, the Harris hip score was evaluated. The radiographic parameters included bony incorporation between the host bone and allograft, the change in cup inclination, acetabular cup migration, radiolucency around the cup and loosening. RESULTS: The mean Harris hip score was improved from a preoperative 54.1 to 91.9 at the last follow up. Radiological incorporation between the host bone and allograft was achieved after an average 11.4 months after surgery. The mean change in cup inclination was 1.9 degrees, and the mean medial and superior migration was 3.93 mm and 4.41 mm respectively. The majority of these radiological changes occurred within 6 months after surgery. One case of Brooker grade I heterotopic ossification and one case of acetabular cup loosening was observed but there was no re-revision or complications, such as infection and dislocation. CONCLUSION: In a severe acetabular bone stock deficiency that cannot be reconstructed with a cementless acetabular cup, an acetabular reconstruction with an impacted morselized allograft, wire mesh and cemented acetabular cup showed good results in this short term follow up study.
Subject(s)
Humans , Acetabulum , Allografts , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Joint Dislocations , Follow-Up Studies , Hip , Ossification, HeterotopicABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study examined the minimum seven years clinical and radiological results of revision total hip arthroplasty using an allogenic impaction bone graft and a cemented cup in an acetabular bone deficiency. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty two revision total hip arthroplasty procedures performed on forty nine patients between March 1992 and June 1998 and followed for more than minimum seven years were examined. The clinical and radiological results were evaluated by Harris hip score and roentgenography including anterior-posterior view of pelvis and lateral view of operated hip. RESULTS: The mean Harris hip score was 47 points preoperatively, 81 points at three years after revision, and 84 points at seven years. The radiological evaluation revealed osseous union that trabeculated between grafted bone and host bone within four months in 47 hips, a complete grafted bone-cement radiolucent line of two millimeters or more in at least one zone in 5 hips at two years and in 7 hips at the seven year follow-up. CONCLUSION: We recommend the technique using an allogenic impaction bone graft and cemented cup to reconstruct an acetabular cavitary defect in revision total hip arthroplasty.